Sarina Lalla is a medical student in the Class of 2020 at McMaster University
When McMaster medical students learn about medical conditions in a problem-based setting, we frequently use the mnemonic “DEEPICT” (Definition, Epidemiology, Etiology, Prognosis, Investigations, Clinical presentations, Treatment) to approach them. Medical schools focus on teaching students about these important aspects of diseases; with time and practice, this information can be retained and applied by students to make them better clinicians.
However, there is also value in understanding a disease through the eyes of patients. More specifically, it is critical to recognize how facing an illness and navigating the healthcare system impacts their lives. Patients are the experts on their own experiences, and the knowledge they can present in the form of stories can teach us a lot. While we learn how to interpret information in the form of bloodwork and imaging, patients present first and foremost with a story. ...continue reading →
At its core, humanism is a concept which weaves together the science and the art of medicine. The American , established by the Gold family in an effort to “nurture and preserve the tradition of the caring physician,” has been striving to accomplish this since its inception through the development of various programs — including the to honour caring and compassionate mentors in medical school education.
, Vice President of Education at the Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada (AFMC), notes that this ideal — providing compassionate care that is sensitive to patients’ values, as well as the integrity and nature of the physician-patient relationship — resonates quite strongly with Canadian medical students as well. ...continue reading →
Yes I did wake up at 3 am today and think, "I'll just check the U.S. election results..." and boy do I regret not going to bed earlier because there was no sleeping after that. Since 3am I’ve read at least a hundred articles analyzing the election’s outcome. I’ve been openly “with her” throughout the campaign. I’m a UK citizen living in Canada so nobody cares, but I'm a woman and the misogyny that the campaign has brought into sharp focus has upset me greatly, so I care. It means I’ve been zipping back and forth through the stages of loss for the past few hours. ...continue reading →
Trevor Hancock is a professor and senior scholar at the University of Victoria’s
In this week of the , it is worth considering the health care system’s contribution to climate change and how it can be reduced.
Health care, not surprisingly, is a bit of an energy pig. After all, health care comprises a large part of our economy – about 11% of GDP – and with around 2 million workers, it's the third largest employment sector in Canada after retail and manufacturing. Moreover, our hospitals run 24/7, use a lot of energy-intensive equipment and maintain an even temperature no matter the temperature. That's why hospitals are among the most energy-intensive facilities in our communities. ...continue reading →
Trevor Hancock is a professor and senior scholar at the University of Victoria’s
The federal election seems to be focusing largely on issues such as the economy and security. If health is mentioned at all, it is in the context of health care.
But health care is a determinant of our health; it is not the main one. While our genetic inheritance also plays an important part, much of our health comes from the environmental, social, economic, cultural and political conditions we create as communities and as a society.
In our system, the federal government does not provide health care or manage a health-care system, aside from special situations such as for aboriginal people and the armed forces. But many other areas of policy for which the federal government does have full or at least partial jurisdiction do influence the health of Canadians. ...continue reading →
is a CMAJ Associate Editor and a professor of primary care in Northern Ireland, UK
French general practitioners today. It’s part of an that includes refusing to process paperwork and a number of planned medical centre closures. Not every GP could participate today, however, due to a flu epidemic sweeping across France. Doctors had already closed their offices during December but there was little response from Marisol Touraine, the Minister for Health, and this was part of their planned efforts to maintain pressure.
Money is one problem. The agreed fees paid by l'Assurance Maladie . Doctors are paid €23 euro per consultation with for 2013 of just over ...continue reading →
Today, 12/12/14, sees 533 partners in 103 countries participating in events to mark the first ever .
Supported by a grant from the , 12/12 marks the anniversary of the unanimous UN , that endorsed Universal Health Coverage as a priority for sustainable development.
The aim is to highlight the need to improve the effectiveness and accessibility of heath care worldwide. Why? As this (slightly UK-focused) video from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine elegantly illustrates ...continue reading →
is Director, Health Program at the , Australia, an expert adviser with and the former President and Chief Executive Officer of
If you look at an old map of Canadian healthcare policy, just near Privatization Island is a big warning: “Here be dragons.” So it proved for Alberta Health Services recently when a seemingly innocuous decision -- to swap the tender for laboratory services from a United States-based transnational corporation to an Australian one -- fueled by discontent.
Part of the problem is that ‘privatization’ has two meanings. One refers to an increase in the private funding of healthcare. In the Canadian context that is unequivocally bad. It breaks the compact between Canadians that they are all in the same boat in terms of access to healthcare and strikes at one of the key differences between the U.S. and Canada. On one side of the border, people can sleep easy knowing they are protected against the costs of healthcare if something goes wrong for them or their family. On the southern side, the spectre of bankruptcy or no care looms, even in the post-Obamacare world.
But Alberta’s controversy over lab contracts is about a different sort of privatization. It is about who delivers care within the publically funded system. ...continue reading →
is a physician specializing in diabetes care at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. He conducts research in the Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit at Mayo Clinic, and is a member of both the National Advisory Council for Healthcare Research and Quality to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the steering committee of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration. Dr Montori is a keynote speaker at the forthcoming
On Saturday November 22 2014, I will have the privilege to speak with the North American Primary Care Research Group plenary gathered in New York City, on Minimally Disruptive Medicine.
What will I try to accomplish? Beyond the stated objectives, I am hoping to promote among participants a new lens of looking at how we might organize and deliver care for patients with multiple chronic conditions. At the heart of my presentation will be the need to be careful and kind when caring for and about our patients, particularly those likely to be overwhelmed by multiple chronic conditions.
Careful care reminds us of our commitment to patients in terms of technically correct and safe care. For patients with multimorbidity, this means that we must understand how multimorbidity affects the efficacy and safety of routine interventions. Major uncertainty exists in this exercise, uncertainty that should lead us to only conditional recommendations, the kind that require us to engage patients in collaborative deliberation. This uncertainty gives clinicians permission to to care for each patient, rather than to attain targets.
Domhnall MacAuley is a CMAJ Associate Editor and a professor of primary care in Northern Ireland, UK
The “” could radically change the way doctors make treatment decisions in the UK. , in response to the death of his wife from cancer, seeks to change the law to allow doctors to use experimental treatments, a concept that challenges evolved standards of practice. This Private Members Bill, which will be discussed at committee stage in the UK House of Lords on Friday, provoked ongoing discussions among leading doctors highlighting the tension between evidence based medicine and innovative clinical practice.
Medicine has made many mistakes in the past, some of which are listed in the website of the , the brainchild of Iain Chalmers, champion of the randomised controlled trial. While they recognise that doctors have always done their best, patients have been harmed because doctors didn’t have reliable knowledge on the effectiveness of treatment. As scientists, we recognise the need to make decisions based on the best evidence available and, equally important, to identify the harms. But, emotion is a powerful motivation ...continue reading →