Why I called André Picard’s column on mental illness a nothingburger

is Deputy Editor at CMAJ

 

A week ago, André Picard published entitled “How many people actually suffer from mental illness?” and later to readers for making that column the publication’s most-read story of the day. The column may have been well-read - it certainly sparked controversy on social media - but it wasn't because Picard had anything very profound to say. In fact the piece was based on an epidemiological faux pas, which is why .

Commenting on the findings of a poll commissioned by Sun Life Financial Canada, which found that 49% of Canadians have “experienced a mental health issue” at some point in their lives, Picard mistakenly drew a line between the findings of a national survey seeking to establish lifetime prevalence of self-reported symptoms of mental ill health and our health system’s present failure to meet treatment need for mental illness. Because he's André Picard, some people nodded their heads in agreement as he joined dots that had no business being joined.

Picard wrote that numbers don’t speak for themselves and that they need some unpacking before jumping to conclusions. He then jumped straight to the conclusion that, as a society, we are “increasingly leaving people with the impression that having feelings and emotions is somehow problematic” and that “what the poll tells us, more than anything else, is that we are pathologizing normal emotions.”

Wow, that’s quite a leap. But let’s be clear: there’s no more scientific basis for drawing that conclusion than for drawing the conclusion that half of people in Canada currently have a mental illness, which would obviously be false.

Some physicians politely commented on Twitter that they “don't see a lot of mental health resources being abused by the not sick enough’”, to which Picard replied that, “People with severe, life-threatening illness are not getting adequate attention or care. Those who are over-diagnosed (or 'not sick enough') are not wasting resources as much as they are distracting us from focusing on those most in need.”

Okay, so, which is it? Is it Let’s Talk about mental illness to reduce stigma? Or did I miss the memo that #letstalk is only a January hashtag because actually too much owning up to mental health issues really just ruins it for people who have proper mental illness?

One maternal mental health advocate , “Why… would you write this just as we’re gaining ground in #mentalhealth awareness?” and continued, “Your article panders to those who wrongly believe mental illness is a crock. You’ve just set the clock back 50 years.”

I don’t agree that Picard's column has the clock back 50 years. It would take a lot more than one column - even one from a veteran health journalist with close-to-godlike status who is deservedly renowned for his insight into the Canadian health system - to do that. But I do think that Picard was irresponsible to write it, given his national influence. Here's why.

For one thing, careless spin like Picard's column throws governments a free pass on mental health.“Don’t worry, [Government], it’s not your fault for designing and funding mental health services appallingly badly; it’s the fault of all those pesky not-sick-enoughs distracting service providers from the properly mentally ill who are much closer to death’s door and therefore worth treating.” Obviously I exaggerate for effect, but this is just the sort of poorly examined thinking that makes mental illness the Cinderella of diseases, .

, funding treatment at an early stage of disease – or even pre-disease - is way more efficient than treating only the very sick. No one would even try to dispute that today. Yet it seems that many are still unable to grasp the logic when it applies to mental illness.

Furthermore, and perhaps more worryingly, suggesting that there is a threshold below which you should not presume to call your mental discomfort 'an issue', might silence people who really should be reaching out for help. Mental illness does not announce itself as illness, you see. It plays tricks on the mind and causes self-destruction by thought. Self-doubt, self-loathing, self-denial, self-abasement, feelings of unworthiness: these are its calling cards. People with mental illness often don’t feel sick as much as they feel like the wrong person in the wrong place at the wrong time, wearing the wrong skin. it can take time to put a name to the state of mind.

I had postnatal depression after the birth of my first child. It took me 7 months of feeling like the wrongest mother in the world before I understood that it was depression (and I was a physician working in psychiatric research at the time). Only once I had the insight did I see that it was by no means my first episode of depression; my first (of several that predated it) was probably when I was about fourteen or fifteen. Would that I had had the mental health literacy in my teens to be able to identify my condition; perhaps I might have saved myself decades of truly awful quality of life and disability. When my first child was a year old I was lucky enough to get to be a guinea pig in a pilot trial of mindfulness based behavioral therapy, which worked very well for me and helped me to taper my antidepressants. After the birth of my second child, however, I started getting depressed again. Having insight, I knew exactly what it was and I reached out right away for help, only to be met with a bit of skepticism on some fronts… as if having great insight into my condition and being high-functioning meant I couldn’t be all that unwell. I didn't care. I knew what it was and I knew I needed care. Despite my poor mood I had enough self-knowledge to advocate for myself. This is the benefit of being able to articulate your state of mind.

So, did all those people surveyed by Sun Life who reported a ‘mental health issue’ (and, yes, that is a meaningless journalistic term, as Picard rightly pointed out) have a diagnosable mental illness?
Probably not. More accurate estimates put lifetime prevalence of diagnosable mental illness in Canada
But does it matter? If they didn't tick all the DSM-5 boxes does it mean that those who reported a mental health issue weren’t distressed by it or that their quality of life was not diminished by their discomfort?
Let's remember that psychiatric diagnoses are constructs devised mainly for research purposes and tofaciliate professional diagnostic agreement. These diagnostic criteria are not biomarkers; being able to tick boxes and categorize people as binary disorder/no-disorder does not make physicians experts on the subjective impact of symptoms on a person’s quality of life. And quality of life is a key indicator in mental illness. At the end of the day there must be a place for people to articulate their experience and for that experience to be acknowledged as being real.
Can we really say, of mental illness, that someone is 'not sick enough'?

Are physicians  being inundated by scores of patients reporting sort-of-mental-health-issues and demanding care?
Are physicians confused and overwhelmed because they can’t tell who’s really sick and who isn’t?
Er, no, I don't think this is our main problem.

Are there lots of people with debilitating mental illness who need treatment but can’t access it in Canada?
ABSOLUTELY! Let’s keep our eye on that ball and not get distracted by nothingburgers.

Is it a bad thing that people are in touch enough with their state of mind to be able to report feeling mentally-not-so-great even though they may never have sought professional help for it?
For goodness sake, NO! We should be celebrating that.

Just yesterday the mental health advocate and author, , tweeted, "Telling someone with anxiety they are wrapped up in themselves is like telling someone with their leg on fire they are a bit shouty. Worry heads inwards."
Perhaps Matt's analogy seems dramatic, but it really IS that dangerous to try to silence people on mental illness.

Here’s a thing. You know CBT and mindfulness, those non-drug therapies that have been shown to work about as well for conditions like moderate depression, anxiety disorder, OCD and even addiction, as drug treatments? Well, I'll let you in on a secret: the way that those techniques work is first to help people become aware of what they are feeling Taking steps to deal with how those feelings are messing up their life is only a follow-up step. Awareness of mental state is a prerequisite to recovery.

So if we are going to jump to far-fetched conclusions based on the very lowest quality of evidence researchers can drum up – as André Picard did in his column - let’s avoid producing irresponsible and possibly harmful clickbait. Heck, how about we jump to a radically positive conclusion? We could just as well observe that human beings, collectively, seem to be in a place where we are more comfortable than ever before with naming and expressing our difficult feelings and acknowledging our mental states. I, for one, think that’s great.

* Nothingburger, , means "something lame, dead-end, a dud, insignificant; especially something with high expectations that turns out to be average, pathetic, or overhyped."